This episode I explain how we sense chemicals by way of smell, taste
and pheromones. How things smell and taste and bodily chemicals of
others have a profound effect on how we feel, what we do and our
hormones. I explain the 3 types of responses to smell, the 5 types of
tastes, the possible existence of sixth taste sense. I explain how
smell and taste reflect brain health and can be used to assess and
even promote brain regeneration. Both basic science and protocols are
described including how to make sour things taste sweet and how to
develop a heightened sense of smell and taste.
- Introduction
- Sensing Chemicals: Smell, Taste & Chemicals That People Make To Control Each Other
- Vision Protocols Recap (Brief) & Correction
- Color Vision: Excellent Resource: What is Color? (The Book)
- How We Sense Chemicals: Enter Our Nose, Mouth, Eyes, Skin
- The Chemicals From Other People’s Tears Lower Testosterone & Libido
- SMELL: Sniffing, A Piece of Your Brain In Your Nose, 3 Responses To Smells
- Smells & Memory: Why They Are So Powerfully Associated
- Pheromone Effects: Spontaneous Miscarriage, Males & Timing Female Puberty
- Sniffing Creates Alertness & If Done Properly Can Help You Focus & Learn Better
- Protocol 1: Sniffing (Nothing) 10-15X Enhances Your Ability to Smell & Taste
- Smelling Salts, Ammonia & Adrenaline
- How You Can Become A Human Scent Hound, Detecting Cancer, & Tasting Better
- Smell As A Readout Of Brain Health & Longevity; Regaining Lost Sense Of Smell
- Dopamine, Sense Of Smell, New Neurons & New Relationships
- Why Brain Injury Causes Loss Of Smell; Using Smell To Gauge & Speed Recovery
- Using Smell To Immediately Becoming Physically Stronger
- Smelling In Our Dreams, Active Sniffing In Sleep, Sniffing As a Sign Of Consciousness
- Mint Scents Create Alertness By Activating Broad Wake-Up Pathways
- Protocol 2 Pleasant Or Putrid: The Microwave Popcorn Test, Cilantro, Asparagus, Musk
- Skunks, Costello, All Quiet On The Western Front
- TASTE: Sweet, Salty, Bitter, Umami, Sour; Your Tongue, Gustatory Nerve, NST, Cortex
- Energy, Electrolytes, Poisons, Gagging, Amino Acid & Fatty Acid Sensing, Fermentation
- Our 6th Sense of Taste: FAT Sensing
- Gut-Brain: Your Mouth As An Extension Of Your Gut; Burned Mouth & Regeneration
- Protocol 3: Learn To Be A Super-Taster By Top-Down Behavioral Plasticity
- The Umami-Sweet Distinction: Tigers Versus Pandas
- Eating More Plants Versus Eating More Meat, Cravings & Desire
- Food That Makes You Feel Good Or Bad: Taste Receptors On Our Testes Or Ovaries
- Biological Basis For The Sensuality of Umami and Sweet Foods
- Appetitive & Aversive Sensing: Touching Certain Surfaces, Tasting Certain Foods
- Amino Acids Are Key To Life, The Maillard Reaction, Smell-Taste Merge, Food Texture
- How Processed Food Make You Crave More Processed Foods
- Protocol 4: Invert Your Sense of Sweet & Sour: Miracle Fruit; Swapping Bitter & Sweet
- Pheromones, Desire To Continue Mating: Coolidge Effect Occurs In Males & Females
- Do Women Influence Each Others Menstrual Cycles?
- Recognizing the Smell Of Your Romantic Partner
- Differences In Odor Detection Ability, Effects Of Hormones
- We Rub The Chemicals Of Others On Our Eyes and Skin, Bunting Behavior
- Summary
-- Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast, where we discuss science and
science-based tools for everyday life. [gentle music] I'm Andrew
Huberman, and I'm a Professor of Neurobiology and Ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. This podcast is separate from my teaching
and research roles at Stanford. It is however, part of my desire and
effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and
science-related tools to the general public. In keeping with that
theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast. Our first
sponsor is Roka. Roka makes sunglasses and eyeglasses that in my
opinion are the absolute best out there. The sunglasses and eyeglasses
that are made by Roka have a number of properties that are really
unique. First of all, they're extremely lightweight, you never even
notice that they're on your face. Second, the optical clarity is
fantastic. One of the things that's really hard to accomplish, but
that Roka succeeded in accomplishing is making sunglasses that you can
wear in lots of different environments. As you move from bright to
shadowed regions for instance, or as the amount of sunlight changes
many eyeglasses will make it such that it's hard to see your
environment and you need to take the eyeglasses off, or you can't see
or detect borders. With Roka sunglasses, all of that is seamless, they
clearly understand the adaptation mechanisms and habituation
mechanisms, all these fancy details about the human visual system have
allowed them to design a sunglass that allows you to be in any
environment and to see that environment extremely well. The eyeglasses
are terrific, I wear readers at night and again, they just make the
whole experience of reading or working on a screen at night very, very
easy, very easy on the eyes. The aesthetic of the eyeglasses and
sunglasses is also suburb. You know, I chuckle sometimes when I see
sports frames or sports glasses, a lot of them just look ridiculous
frankly, but the Roka eyeglasses and sunglasses have a terrific
aesthetic, they have a huge variety to select from. If you'd like to
try Roka glasses, you can go to Roka, that's roka.com and enter the
code Huberman and you'll get 20% off your first order, that's roka.com
and enter the code Huberman to get 20% off your first order. Today's
podcast is also brought to us by InsideTracker. InsideTracker is a
personalized nutrition platform that analyzes data from your blood and
DNA to help you better understand your body and help you reach your
health goals. I'm a big believer in getting regular blood work done
for the simple reason that many of the factors that impact your
immediate and long-term health can only be detected from a quality
blood test. One of the major problems with blood tests however is that
oftentimes you'll get information back about levels of metabolic
factors, hormones, et cetera, and there won't be any directives about
what to do with that information. With InsideTracker, it makes all of
that very easy. First of all, they can come to your home to do the
blood test and DNA test or you can go to a local clinic, they make
that very easy. Second of all, when you get the information back about
the levels of hormones, and metabolic factors, and other things in
your blood it gives you simple directives. They have a dashboard that
allows you to assess for instance, whether or not you ought to make
changes in your nutrition, or changes in your exercise, or changes in
your sleep regimen, any number of different lifestyle factors that can
help bring the markers and the various factors in your blood and DNA
to the appropriate levels. So, really they're putting you in the
driver's seat for your health. In fact, one of the listeners of this
podcast contacted me recently and said I took an InsideTracker test, I
felt like I was in great health, but I noticed from the test that I
had high CRP, C-reactive protein. C-reactive protein is a marker that
if it's too high is a cautionary note about various cardiac and even
eye diseases, so it's something that they are now taking actions on as
a consequence of getting their blood work done and taking the
InsideTracker test. So, I think that's just one of many examples that
we hear about. I have examples from my own life for instance of
different factors in my blood being off and making adjustments to
nutrition and other aspects of my life that have allowed me to bring
those into the proper range. So, if you care about your health
InsideTracker may very well be right for you. If you'd like to try
InsideTracker you can go to insidetracker.com/huberman. And if you do
that, you'll get 25% off any of InsideTracker's plans, just use the
code Huberman at checkout. Today's episode is also brought to us by
Athletic Greens. Athletic Greens is an all-in-one vitamin, mineral
probiotic drink. I've been using Athletic Greens since 2012 so I'm
delighted that they're sponsoring the podcast. Athletic Greens is
terrific because it covers your nutritional bases. If I drink Athletic
Greens once and I sometimes drink it twice a day, then I'm sure that
all the vitamins I need, I'm getting those. All the minerals I need,
I'm getting those, and the probiotics. There's now a ton of data
showing that a healthy gut microbiome is vital to brain function,
vital to immune function, and vital to all aspects of our health. So
with Athletic Greens, you get the vitamins, the minerals, and the
probiotics to cover all your bases. In fact, anytime people ask me
what should they take or what could they do to support their health,
provided that they already have their sleep and other aspects of their
life in order, Athletic Greens is the thing that I recommend because
it covers all the foundations, all the bases of what one really wants
from a supplement without having to take a ton of different things. It
also tastes great, almost everybody that tries it and then reported
back to me has told me that they really liked the taste. I mix mine
with water, a little bit of lemon and lime juice, and I really like
the taste, it's delicious to me. I drink it once or twice a day. It's
keto compatible, it's compatible with most fasting regimens, it's
compatible with if you're a vegan or if you're not vegan, it's
compatible with essentially every nutritional plan out there, so it's
just a terrific all around supplement and benefit to one's health and
diet. If you'd like to try Athletic Greens, you can go to
athleticgreens.com/huberman. And if you do that, you'll claim a
special offer, they'll give you five free travel packs that make it
easy to mix up Athletic Greens while you're on the road, and they'll
give you a year supply of vitamin D3, K2. Again, go to
athleticgreens.com/huberman to claim that special offer.
This month, we've been talking about the senses, how we detect things
in our environment. The last episode was all about vision, how we take
light and convert that information into things that we can perceive
like colors, and faces, and motion, things of that sort as well as how
we use light to change our biology in ways that are subconscious that
we don't realize, things like mood, and metabolism, and levels of
alertness. Today, we're going to talk about chemical sensing, we're
going to talk about the sense of smell, our ability to detect odors in
our environment. We're also going to talk about taste, our ability to
detect chemicals and make sense of chemicals that are put in our mouth
and into our digestive tract. And we are going to talk about chemicals
that are made by other human beings that powerfully modulator the way
that we feel, our hormones, and our health. Now, that last category
are sometimes called pheromones. However, whether or not pheromones
exist in humans is rather controversial, there actually hasn't been a
clear example of a true human pheromonal effect, but what is
absolutely clear, what is undeniable is that there are chemicals that
human beings make and release in things like tears onto our skin, and
sweat, and even breath that powerfully modulate or control the biology
of other individuals. In fact right now, even if you're completely
alone, your chemical environment internally is being controlled by
external chemicals, your nervous system, and your hormones, and your
metabolism are being modified by things in your environment, so we're
going to talk about those. It's an absolutely fascinating aspect to
our biology, it's one of our most primordial, meaning primitive
aspects of our biology, but it's still very active in all of us today.
This episode, believe it or not, will have a lot of tools, a lot of
protocols. Even though I'm guessing most of you can probably smell
your environment just fine, that you know what you like to eat and
what tastes good, and what doesn't taste good to you, today's episode
is going to talk about tools that will allow you to actually leverage
these chemical sensing mechanisms, including how you smell not how you
smell in the qualitative sense, but how you smell in the verb sense,
the action of sniffing and smelling to enhance your sense of smell and
to enhance your sense of taste as well, believe it or not, to enhance
your cognition, your ability to learn and remember things. Everything
we're going to talk about as always is grounded in quality peer-
reviewed studies from some excellent laboratories, I'll provide some
resources along the way, so that means tools and protocols and also
basic information. You're going to learn a ton of neuroscience and lot
of biology in general. And I think what you'll come to realize by the
end is that while we are clearly different from the other animals,
there are aspects to our biology that are very similar to that of
other animals in very interesting ways.
Before we dive into chemical sensing, I want to just briefly touch on
a few things from the vision episode. One is a summary of a protocol.
So, I covered 13 protocols last episode, if you haven't seen that
episode, check it out. Those protocols will allow you to be more alert
and to see better over time if you follow them. All of them are zero
cost, you can find any and all of them at hubermanlab.com, there's a
link to those videos and tools and protocols, everything is
timestamped. The two protocols that I just want to remind everybody of
are the protocol of near-far viewing that all of us regardless of age,
should probably spend about five minutes three times a week, doing
some near-far viewing exercises. So, that would be bringing a pen or
pencil up close to the point where you're about to cross your eyes,
but you don't cross your eyes and then out at some distance. And then
look beyond that pen or other object that you're using off as far as
you can into the distance. It would be great if you could do this on a
balcony or deck and then look way off in the distance and then bring
it back in. This is going to exercise that accommodation reflex, the
change in the shape of the lens can help offset a number of things
including myopia, near-sightedness. The other one is this incredible
study that showed that two hours a day outside, even if you're doing
other things while you're outside can help offset myopia,
nearsightedness. So, try and get outside, it's really the sunlight and
the blue light, right? Everyone's been demonizing blue light out
there, but blue light is great provided it's not super, super bright
and really close to your eyes. Blue is terrific if it comes from
sunlight. Two hours a day outside is going to help offset myopia,
nearsightedness. Now, that's a lot of time, I think most of us are not
getting that time, but since you can do other things like gardening,
or reading, or walking, or running. If you can get that two hours
outside your visual system and your brain will benefit. I also would
like to make one brief correction to something that I said incorrectly
in the previous episode. At the end of the episode, I talked about
lutein, and how lutein may help offset some moderate to severe age-
related macular degeneration. As well, I talked about how some people
are supplementing with lutein even though they don't have age-related
macular degeneration with the idea in mind that it might help offset
some vision loss as they get older. I said lutein, and lutein was the
correct thing to say, but once or twice, when I started speaking fast
I said leucine and not lutein. I want to emphasize that leucine, an
amino acid, very interesting, important for muscle building covered in
previous episodes, but lutein, L-U-T-E-I-N, is the molecule and
compound that I was referring to in terms of supplementing for sake of
vision. So I apologize, please forgive me I misspoke, a couple of you
caught that right away, in listening to the episode after it went up I
realized that I had misspoken. So, lutein for vision, leucine for
muscles, and muscle growth, and strength, et cetera.
Before we dive into the content of today's episode, I want to just
briefly touch on color vision. Many of you asked questions about color
vision and color perception. And indeed color perception is a
fascinating aspect of the human visual system, it's one of the things
that makes us unique. There are certainly other animals out there that
can detect all the colors of the rainbow, some can even detect into
the infrared, into the far-red that we can't see, but nonetheless,
human color vision, provided that somebody isn't colorblind, is really
remarkable. And if you're interested in color vision or you want to
answer questions about art or about for instance why that dress that
showed up online a few years ago looks blue to you and yellow to
somebody else. All the answers to that are in this terrific book which
is "What Is Color?: 50 Questions and Answers on the Science of Color".
I did not write this book, I wish I had, the book is by Arielle and
Joann Eckstut, that E-C-K-S-T-U-T. So, it's "What Is Color?: 50
Questions and Answers on the Science of Color". It's an absolutely
fabulous book, I've no business relationship to them. I did help them
get in contact with some color vision scientists when they reached out
to me. And you can know that all the information in the book was
vetted by excellent color vision scientists. It's a really wonderful
and beautiful book, the illustrations are beautiful. If you're
somebody who's interested in design or art, or you're just curious
about the science of color, it's a terrific book, I highly recommend
it. If you just look it up online, there are a variety of places that
will allow you to access the book.
So, let's talk about sensing chemicals and how chemicals control us.
In our environment, there are a lot of different physical stimuli.
There is light, photons, which are light energy and those land on your
retinas and your retinas tell your brain about them, and your brain
creates this thing we call vision. There are sound waves, literally
particles moving through the air and reverberations that create what
we call sound and hearing. And of course there are mechanical stimuli,
pressure, light touch, scratch, tickle, et cetera, that lands on our
skin or the blowing of a breeze that deflects the hairs on our skin,
and we can sense mechanical touch, mechanical sensation. And there are
chemicals, there are things floating around in the environment which
we call volatile chemicals. So, volatile sounds oftentimes like
emotionally volatile, but it just means that they're floating around
out there. So, when you actually smell something like let's say you
smell a wonderfully smelling rose or cake. Yes, you are inhaling the
particles into your nose, they're literally little particles of those
chemicals are going up into your nose and being detected by your
brain. Also, if you smell something putrid, disgusting, or awful, use
your imagination, those particles are going up into your nose and
being detected by neurons that are part of your brain. Other ways of
getting chemicals into our system is by putting them in our mouth, by
literally taking foods and chewing them, or sucking on them and
breaking them down into their component parts, and that's one way that
we sense chemicals with this thing, our tongue. And there are
chemicals that can enter through other mucosal linings and other kind
of just think damp, sticky linings of your body. And the main ones
would be the eyes, so you've got your nose, your eyes and your mouth.
But mainly when we have chemicals coming into our system it's through
our nose or through our mouth. Although, sometimes through our skin
certain things can go transdermal, not many, and through our eyes. So
these chemicals, we sometimes bring into our body, into our biology,
through deliberate action. We select a food, we chew that food, and we
do it intentionally. Sometimes they're coming into our body through
non-deliberate action. We enter an environment, and there's smoke and
we smell the smoke, and as a consequence we take action. Sometimes we
are forced to eat something because somebody tells us we should eat it
or we do it to be polite. So, there are all these ways that chemicals
can make it into our body. Sometimes however, other people are
actively making chemicals with their body, typically this would be
with their breath, with their tears, or possibly, I want to underscore
possibly, by making what are called pheromones, molecules that they
release into the environment typically through the breath that enter
our system through our nose, or our eyes, or our mouth that
fundamentally change our biology. I will explain how smell and taste
and these pheromone effects work, but I'll just give an example, which
is a very salient and interesting one that was published about 10
years ago in the Journal Science.
Science Magazine is one of the three what we call apex journals. There
are a lot of journals out there, but for those of you that want to
know, Science Magazine, Nature Magazine, and Cell are considered the
three top kind of apex journals, they are the most stringent in terms
of getting papers accepted, they're even reviewed there. They have
about a 95% rejection rate at the front gate, meaning they don't even
review 95% of what gets sent to them. Of the things that they do
decide to review then get sent out, a very small percentage of those
get published, it's very stringent. This paper came out in Science
showing that humans, men in particular in this study, have a strong
biological response and hormonal response to the tears of women. What
they did is they had women, and in this case it was only women for
whatever reason, cry and they collected their tears. Then those tears
were smelled by male subjects, or male subjects got what was
essentially the control, which was the saline. Men that smelled these
tears that were evoked by sadness had a reduction in their
testosterone levels that was significant. They also had a reduction in
brain areas that were associated with sexual arousal. Now, before you
run off with your interpretations about what this means and criticize
the study for any variety of reasons, let's just take a step back. I
will criticize the study for a variety of reasons too. One is that
they only used female tiers and male subjects, so it would have been
nice for them to also use female tears and female subjects smelling
those, male tears and male subjects smelling those, male tears and
female subjects smelling those, and so on. They didn't do that, they
did have a large number of subjects, so that's good, that adds power
to the study. And they did have to collect these tears by having the
women watch what was essentially a sad scene from a movie. They
actually recruited subjects that had a high propensity for crying at
sad movies, which was not all women. It turns out that the people that
they recruited for the study were people who said, "Yes, I tend to cry
when I see sad things in movies." What they're really trying to do is
get just get tears that were authentically cried in response to
sadness, as opposed to putting some irritant in the eye and collecting
tears that were evoked by something else like just having the eyes
irritated. Nonetheless, what this study illustrates is that there are
chemicals in tears that are evoking or changing the biology of other
individuals. Now, most of us don't think about sniffing or smelling
other people's tears, but you can imagine how in close couples, or in
family members, or even close friendships, et cetera, that we are
often in close proximity to other people's tears. Now, I didn't select
this study as an example because I want to focus on the effects of
tears on hormones, per se, although I do find the results really
interesting. I chose it because I wanted to just emphasize or
underscore the fact that chemicals that are made by other individuals
are powerfully modulating our internal state, and that's something
that most of us don't appreciate. I think most of us can appreciate
the fact that if we smell something putrid, we tend to retract, or if
we smell something delicious, we tend to lean into it. But there are
all these ways in which chemicals are affecting our biology, and
interpersonal communication using chemicals is not something that we
hear that often about, but it's super interesting.
So, let's talk about smell and what smell is and how it works. I'm
going to make this very basic, but I am going to touch on some of the
core elements of the neurobiology. So, here's how smell works. Smell
starts with sniffing. Now, that may come as no surprise, but no
volatile chemicals can enter our nose unless we inhale them. If our
nose is occluded, or if we're actively exhaling it's much more
difficult for smells to enter our nose, which is why people cover
their nose when something smells bad. Now, the way that these volatile
odors come into the nose is interesting. The nose has a mucosal
lining, mucus that is designed to trap things, to actually bring
things in and get stuck there. At the base of your brain, so you could
actually imagine this or if you wanted, you could touch the roof of
your mouth. So, right above the roof of the mouth, about two
centimeters is your olfactory bulb. The olfactory bulb is a collection
of neurons and those neurons actually extend out of the skull, out of
your skull into your nose into the mucosal lining. So, what this means
in kind of a literal sense is that you have neurons that extend their
little dendrites and axon-like things, they're little processes as we
call them, out into the mucus, and they respond to different odorant
compounds. Now, the olfactory neurons also send a branch deeper into
the brain and they split off into three different paths. So, one path
is for what we call innate odor responses, so you have some hard wired
aspects to the way that you smell the world that were there from the
day you were born and that will be there until the day you die. These
are the pathways and the neurons that respond to things like smoke,
which as you can imagine there's a highly adaptive function to being
able to detect burning things because burning things generally means
lack of safety or impending threat of some kind. It calls for action,
and indeed these neurons project to the central area of the brain
called the amygdala, which is often discussed in terms of fear, but
it's really fear and threat detection. So some compounds, some
chemicals in your environment when you smell them, unless you're
trained to overcome them because you're a firefighter you will
naturally have a heightened level of alertness, you will sense threat,
and if you're in sleep, even it will wake you up. All right, so that's
a good thing, it's kind of an emergency system. You also have neurons
in your nose that respond to odorants or combinations of odorants that
evoke a sense of desire and what we call appetitive behaviors,
approach behaviors, that make you want to move toward something. So,
when you smell a delicious cookie, or some dish that's really savory
that you really like, or a wonderful orange, and you say, "Mmm," or it
feels delicious, or it smells delicious that's because of these innate
pathway, these pathways that require no learning whatsoever. Now, some
of the pathways from the nose, these olfactory neurons into the brain
are involved in learned associations with odors. Many people have this
experience that they can remember the smell of their grandmother's
home, or their grandmother's hands even, or the smell of particular
items baking, or on the stove in a particular environment.
Typically, these memories tend to be of a kind of nurturing sort of
feeling safe and protected. But one of the reasons why olfaction smell
is so closely tied to memory is because olfaction is the most ancient
sense that we have, or I should say chemical sensing is among the most
primitive and ancient senses that we have, probably almost certainly
evolved before vision and before hearing. But when we come into the
world because we're still learning about the statistics of life about
who's friendly and who's not friendly, and where's a fun place to be
and where's a boring place to be, that all takes a long time to learn.
But the olfactory system seems to imprint, seems to lay down memories
very early and create these very powerful associations. And if you
think about it long enough and hard enough many of you can probably
realize that there are certain smells that evoke a memory of a
particular place, or person, or context. And that's because you also
have pathways out of the nose that are not for innate behaviors like
cringing, or repulsion, or gagging, or for that appetitive mmm
sensation, but that just remind you of a place, or a thing, or a
context, could be flowers in spring, could be grandmother's home and
cookies. This is a very common occurrence, and it's a very common
occurrence because this generally exists in all of us. So, we have
pathway for innate responses and a pathway for learned responses. And
then we have this other pathway, and in humans it's a little bit
controversial as to whether or not it sits truly separate from the
standard olfactory system or whether or not it's its own system
embedded in there, but that they call the accessory olfactory pathway.
Accessory olfactory pathway is what in other animals is responsible
for true pheromone effects. We will talk about true pheromone effects,
but for example in rodents and in some primates, including mandrills.
If you've ever seen a mandrill, they have these like big beak noses
things, you may have seen them at the zoo, look them up if you haven't
seen them already, M-A-N-D-R-I-L-S mandrills, there are strong
pheromone effects. Some of those include things like if you take a
pregnant female rodent or mandrill, you take away the father that
created those fetuses or fetus, and you introduce the scent of the
urine or the fur of a novel male, she will spontaneously abort or
miscarry those fetuses, it's a very powerful effect. In humans, it's
still controversial whether or not anything like that can happen, but
it's a very powerful pheromonal effect in other animals. Another
example of a pheromone effect is called the Vandenbergh effect named
after the person who discovered this effect, where you take a female
of a given species that has not entered puberty, you expose her to the
scent or the urine from a sexually competent, meaning post-pubertal
male, and she spontaneously goes into puberty earlier. So, something
about the scent triggers something through this accessory olfactory
system, this is a true pheromonal effect and creates ovulation, right
and menstruation. Or in rodents it's an estrous cycle, not a menstrual
cycle. So, this is not to say that the exact same things happen in
humans. In humans, as I mentioned earlier, there are chemical sensing
between individuals that may be independent of the nose. And we will
talk about those, but those are basically the three paths by which
smells, odors impact us. So, I want to talk about the act of smelling,
and if you are not somebody who is very interested in smell, but you
are somebody who is interested in making your brain work better,
learning faster, remembering more things, this next little segment is
for you because it turns out that how you smell, meaning the act of
smelling, not how good or bad you smell, but the act of smelling,
sniffing, and inhalation powerfully impacts how your brain functions
and what you can learn and what you can't learn.
Breathing generally consists of two actions, inhaling and exhaling,
and we have the option of course to do that through our nose or our
mouth. I've talked on previous episodes about the fact that there are
great advantages to being a nasal breather, and there are a great
disadvantages to being a mouth breather. There are excellent books and
data on this, there's the recent book "Breath" by James Nestor, which
is an excellent book that describes some of the positive effects of
nasal breathing as well as other breathing practices. There's also the
book "Jaws" by my colleagues, Paul Ehrlich and Sandra Kahn, with a
foreword by Jared Diamond and an introduction by Robert Sapolsky from
Stanford. So, that's a book chockablock with heavy hitter authors that
describes how being a nasal breather is beneficial for jaw structure,
for immune system function, et cetera Breathing in through your nose,
sniffing actually has positive effects on the way that you can acquire
and remember information. Noam Sobel's group originally at UC Berkeley
and then at the Weizmann Institute has published a number of papers
that I'd like to discuss today. One of them, Human Non-Olfactory
Cognition Phase-Locked with Inhalation, this was published in Nature
Human Behavior, an excellent journal. Showed that the act of inhaling
[Andrew inhales deeply] has a couple of interesting and powerful
consequences. First of all, as we inhale the brain increases in
arousal, our level of alertness and attention increases when we inhale
as compared to when we exhale. Now, of course with every inhale,
there's an exhale, you could probably double up on your inhales if
you're doing size or something, physiological size I've talked about
these before, so double inhales [inhales twice] followed by an exhale
[exhales], something like that. Or if you're speaking, you're going to
change your cadence and ratio of inhales and exhales, but typically we
inhale, then we exhale. As we inhale, what this paper shows is that
the level of alertness goes up in the brain, and this makes sense
because as the most primitive and primordial sense by which we
interact with our environment and bring chemicals into our system and
detect our environment, inhaling is a cue for the rest of the brain to
essentially to pay attention to what's happening, not just to the
odors as the name of this paper suggests, Human Non-Olfactory
Cognition Phase-Locked with Inhalation. What that means is that the
act of inhaling itself wakes up the brain, it's not about what you're
perceiving or what you're smelling. And indeed sniffing as an action,
inhaling as an action has a powerful effect on your ability to be
alert, your ability to attend, to focus, and your ability to remember
information. When we exhale, the brain goes through a subtle, but
nonetheless significant dip in level of arousal and ability to learn.
So, what does this mean? How should you use this knowledge? Well, you
could imagine, and I think this will be beneficial for most people to
focus on nasal breathing while doing any kind of focused work that
doesn't require that you speak, or eat, or ingest something. There's a
separate paper published in the journal of neuroscience that showed
that indeed if subjects, human subjects, are restricted to breathing
through their nose, they learn better than if they have the option of
breathing through their mouth, or a combination of their nose and
mouth. These are significant effects in humans using modern techniques
from excellent groups. So, sniffing itself is a powerful modulator of
our cognition and our ability to learn. You can imagine all sorts of
ways that you might apply that as a tool. And I suggest that you play
with it a bit that if you're having a hard time staying awake and
alert, you're having a hard time remembering information, you feel
like you have a kind of attention deficit, nonclinical of course,
nasal breathing ought to help, extending or making your inhales more
intense ought to help. Now, this isn't really about chemical sensing
per se, but here's where it gets interesting and exciting. If you are
somebody who doesn't have a very good sense of smell, or you're
somebody who simply wants to get better at smelling and tasting
things, you can actually practice sniffing.
I know that sounds ridiculous, but it turns out that simply sniffing
nothing. So, doing something like this. [Andrew sniffs deeply] I guess
the microphone sort of has a smell [sniffs], I guess my pen doesn't
have a smell. [Andrew sniffs deeply] It turns out that doing a series
of inhales, and of course each one is followed by an exhale, 10 or 15
times and then smelling an object like an orange or another item of
food, or even the skin of somebody else will lead to an increase in
your ability to perceive those odors. Now, there are probably two
reasons for that. One reason is that the brain systems of detecting
things are waking up as a mere consequence of inhaling. Okay, so this
is sort of the olfactory equivalent of opening your eyes wider in
order to see, more or less. Okay, last episode I talked about how
opening your eyes wider actually increases your level of alertness,
it's not just that your level of alertness causes your eyes to be open
wider. Opening your eyes wider can actually increase your level of
alertness. Well, it turns out that breathing more deeply through the
nose, wakes up your brain and it creates a heightened sensitivity of
the neurons that relate to smell. And there's a close crossover, I'm
sure you know this, between smell and taste. If any of you have ever
had a cold or you have for whatever reason you've lost your sense of
smell, you become what they call anosmic, your sense of taste suffers
also. We'll talk a little bit more about why that is in a few minutes,
but as a first protocol, I'd really like all of you to consider
becoming nasal breathers while you're trying to learn, while you're
trying to listen, while you're trying to wake up your brain in any way
and learn and retain information, this is a powerful tool. Now, there
are other ways to wake up your brain more as well. For instance, the
use of smelling salts.
I'm not recommending that you do this necessarily, but there are
excellent peer reviewed data showing that indeed, if you use smelling
salts, which are mostly of the sort that include ammonia, ammonia is a
very toxic scent, but it's toxic in a way that triggers this innate
pathway, the pathway from the nose to the amygdala, and wakes up the
brain and body in a major way. This is why they use smelling salts
when people pass out, this is why fighters used to use or maybe
sometimes still use smelling salts in order to heighten their level of
alertness, this is why powerlifters will inhale smelling salts. They
work because they trigger the fear and kind of overall arousal systems
of the brain, this is why I think most people probably shouldn't use
ammonia or smelling salts to try and wake up, but they really do work.
If you've ever smelled smelling salts and I have, I tried this, they
give you a serious jolt, it's like six espresso infused into your
bloodstream all at once, you are wide awake immediately and you feel a
heightened sense of kind of desire to move because you release
adrenaline into your body. Now, inhaling through your nose and doing
nasal breathing is not going to do that, it's going to be a more
subtle version of waking up your system of alerting your brain
overall. And for those of you that are interested in having a richer,
a more deep connection to the things that you smell and taste,
including other individuals perhaps not just food, practicing or
enhancing your sense of sniffing, your ability to sniff might sound
like a kind of ridiculous protocol, but it's actually a kind of fun
and cool experiment that you can do. You just do the simple experiment
of taking for instance an orange, you smell it, try and gauge your
level of perception of how orange-ish it smells, or lemony, lemonish,
lemony, I don't know is it lemonish or lemony? Lemony it smells, then
set it away, do 10 or 15 inhales [Andrew inhales and exhales] followed
by exhales of course, or just through the nose. [Andrew breaths
rapidly] I'm not going to do all 10 or 15. And then smell it again,
and you'll notice that your perception of that smell, the kind of
richness of that smell will be significantly increased. And that's
again, for two reasons, one, the brain is in a position to respond to
it better, your brain has been aroused by the mere act of sniffing,
but also the neurons that respond to that lemon odor, that lemony or
odor are going to respond better. So, you can actually have a
heightened experience of something, and that of course will also be
true for the taste system.
You also can really train your sense of smell to get much, much
better. When Noam Sobel's group was at Berkeley I happened to be a
graduate student around that time, and every once in a while I'd look
outside and there would be people crawling around on the grass with
goggles on, gloves on, and these hoods on with earmuffs. And they
looked ridiculous, but what they were doing is they were actually
learning to follow scent trails. So, in the world of dogs you have
sight hounds that use their eyes in order to navigate and find things,
and you have scent towns that use their nose. And the scent hounds are
remarkable, they can be trained to detect a scent. These are the
sniffing, you know, the bomb sniffing and the drug sniffing dogs in
airports. There are now dogs actually that can sniff out COVID
infections with a very high degree of accuracy, they can be trained to
do that. There's something about the COVID and similar infections that
the body produces probably in the immune response, some odors and the
dogs are I think as high as 90% in some cases, maybe even 95%
accuracy, just remarkable. There are theories that dogs can sniff out
cancer, this stuff all exceeds statistical significance. It's still a
little bit mysterious in some ways, but you may not ever achieve the
olfactory capabilities of a scent hound, but what Noam Sobel's lab did
is they had people completely eliminate their visual experience by
having them wear dark glasses or goggles, so they couldn't see, and
they couldn't hear, they couldn't sense anything with their sense of
touch, they had thick gloves on. But they had these masks on where
just their nasal passages were open and people could in a fairly short
amount of time learn to follow a chocolate scent trail on the ground,
which is not something that most people want to do, but what they
showed using brain imaging, et cetera in subsequent studies is that
the human brain, you can learn to really enhance your sense of smell
and become very astute in distinguishing whether or not one particular
odor or combinations of odors is such that it's less than, or more
than a different odor for instance. Now, why would you want to do
this? Well, if you like to eat as much as I do, one of the things that
can really enhance your sense of pleasure from the experience of
ingesting food is to enhance your sense of smell. And if you don't
have a great sense of smell, or if you have a sense of smell that's
really so good that it's always picking up bad odors, we'll talk about
that in a minute. Well, then you might want to tune up your sense of
smell by doing this practice of 10 or 15 breaths, excuse me, sniffs,
not breaths, sniffs and then interacting with some food item or thing
that you're interested in smelling more of. So, these could be the
ingredients that you're cooking with, I really encourage you to try
and really smell them. You sometimes hear this as kind of a
mindfulness practice like ooh, really smell the food, really taste the
food. And we always hear about that as kind of a mindfulness and
presence thing, but you actually can increase the sensitivity of your
olfactory and your taste system by doing this. And it has long-term
effects, that's what's so interesting. This isn't the kind of thing
that you have to do every time you eat. You don't have to be the
weirdo in the restaurant that's like picking up the radish and like
jamming it up your nostrils, please don't do that. You don't have to
necessarily smell everything, although it's nice sometimes to smell
the food that you're about to eat and as you eat it, but it has long-
term effects in terms of your ability to distinguish and discriminate
different types of odors. And these don't even have to be very pungent
foods it turns out, the studies show that doesn't have to be some
really stinky cheese, you know, there are cheese shops that I've
walked into where like I just basically gag, I can't handle it, I just
can't be in there, it just overwhelms me. Other people, they love that
smell. So, you have to tune it to your interest and experience, but I
think even for you fasters out there, everybody eats at some point,
everybody ingests chemicals through their mouth. And one of the ways
that you can powerfully increase your relationship to that experience
and make it much more positive is through just the occasional practice
of 10 or 15 sniffs of nothing, which almost sounds ridiculous like how
could that be? But now, you understand why, it's because of the way
that the sniffing action increases the alertness of the brain as well
as increasing the sensitivity of the system. No other system that I'm
aware of in our body is as amenable to these kinds of behavioral
training shifts and allow them to happen so quickly. I would love to
be able to tell you that just doing 10 or 15 near-far exercises with a
pen or going outside for 10 or 15 seconds each morning is going to
completely change the way that you see the world. But it actually
isn't the case, you actually, it requires more training, a little bit
more effort in the visual system. In the olfactory system, and your
smell system, and in your taste system just the tiniest bit of
training and attention, and sniffing, inhaling can radically change
your relationship to food such that you actually start to feel very
different as a consequence of ingesting those foods as well as
becoming more discerning about which foods you like and which ones you
don't like. And we're going to talk about that because there's a
really wonderful thing that happens when you start developing a
sensitive palate and a sensitive sense of smell in a way that allows
you to guide your eating and smelling decisions, and maybe even
interpersonal decisions about who you spend time with, or mate with,
or whatever, in a way that is really in line with your biology.
In fact, how well we can smell and taste things is actually a very
strong indication of our brain health. Now, that's not to say that if
you have a poor sense of smell or a poor sense of taste, that you're
somehow brain damaged or you're going to have dementia, although
sometimes early signs of dementia or loss of neurons in other regions
of the brain related to say Parkinson's can show up first as a loss of
sense of smell. Again, it's not causal, and it's certainly not the
case that every time you have a sudden loss of smell that there's
necessarily brain damage, I want to be very about that, but they are
often correlated. There's also a lot of interest right now in loss of
sense of smell because one of the early detection signs of COVID-19
was a loss of sense of smell. So, I just briefly want to talk about
loss of sense of smell and regaining sense of smell and taste because
these have powerful implications for overall health. And in fact can
indicate something about brain damage and can even inform how quickly
we might be recovering from something like a concussion. So, our
olfactory neurons, these neurons in our nose that detect odors are
really unique among other brain neurons because they get replenished
throughout life, they don't just regenerate, but they get replenished.
So regeneration is when something is damaged and it regrows, these
neurons are constantly turning over throughout our lifespan, they're
constantly being replenished, they're dying off and they're being
replaced by new ones. This is an amazing aspect of our brain that's
basically unique to these neurons, there's one other region of the
brain where there's a little bit of this maybe, but these olfactory
neurons about every three or four weeks they die. And when they die,
they're replaced by new ones that come from a different region of the
brain, a region called the subventricular zone. The name isn't as
important, but as the phenomenon, but these neurons are born in the
ventricle, the area of your brain that's a hole that contains... It's
not an empty hole, it's a hole basically that contains cerebral spinal
fluid. Well, there's a little subventricular zone, there's a little
zone below, sub ventricles. And that zone, if you are exercising
regularly, if your dopamine levels are high enough, those little cells
there are like stem cells. They are stem cells and they spit out what
are called little neuroblasts, those little neuroblasts migrate into
the front of your brain and then shimmy, they kind of move through
what's called the rostral migratory stream. They kind of shimmy along
and land back in your olfactory bulb, settle down and extend little
wires into your olfactory mucosa. This is an ongoing process of what
we call neurogenesis or the birth of new neurons. Now, this is really
interesting because other neurons in your cortex, in your retina, in
your cerebellum, they do not do this, they are not continually
replenished throughout life. But these neurons, these olfactory
neurons are, they are special. And there are a number of things that
seem to increase the amount of olfactory neuron neurogenesis. There is
evidence that exercise, blood flow, can increase olfactory neuron
neurogenesis. Although, those data are fewer in comparison to things
like social interactions, or actually interacting with odorants of
different kinds. So, if you're somebody who doesn't smell things well,
you have a poor sense of smell, your olfactory system doesn't seem
very sensitive, more sniffing, more smelling is going to be good. And
then the molecule dopamine, this neuromodulator, that is associated
with motivation and drive. And in some cases, if it's very, very high
with mania, or if it's very, very low with depression or Parkinson's,
but for most people where dopamine is in essentially normal ranges
dopamine is also a powerful trigger of the establishment of these new
neurons and their migration into the olfactory bulb and your ability
to smell. Now, you don't want to confuse correlation with causation,
so if you're not good at smelling does that mean you have low
dopamine? No, not necessarily. If you have low dopamine, does that
mean that you have a poor sense of smell? No, not necessarily. Some
people who take antidepressants of the sort that impact the dopamine
system strongly like Wellbutrin will report a sudden, meaning within a
couple of days, increase in their ability to smell particular odors,
and it's a very striking effect.
Some people when they are in a new relationship because dopamine and
the hormones, testosterone and estrogen are associated with novelty
and the sorts of behaviors that often are associated with new
relationships those three molecules; dopamine, testosterone, and
estrogen kind of work together. And oftentimes people will say or
report when they're newly in love or in a new relationship that
they're just obsessed with, or they just so enjoy the scent of another
person so much so that they like to borrow the other person's clothing
or they'll sniff the other person's clothing or they can even just in
the absence of the person they can imagine their smell and feel a
biological response, something that we'll talk more about. So, these
neurons turnover throughout the lifespan and as we age, we actually
can lose our sense of smell. And it's likely, I want to underscore
likely, that that loss of sense of smell as we age is correlated with
a loss of other neurons in the retina, in the ears, a loss of vision,
loss of hearing, loss of smell, loss of the sense apparati which our
neurons is correlated with aging. So, what we've been talking about
today is the ability to sense these odors, but what I'd like to do is
empower you with tools that will allow you to keep these systems tuned
up. Last time, we talked about tuning up and keeping your visual
system tuned up and healthy regardless of age. Here, we're talking
about really enhancing your olfactory abilities, your taste abilities
as well by interacting a lot with odors, preferably positive odors,
and sniffing more, inhaling more, which almost sounds crazy, but now
you understand why. Even though it might sound crazy it's grounded in
real mechanistic biology of how the brain wakes up and responds to
these chemicals.
Now, speaking of brain injury, olfactory dysfunction is a common theme
in traumatic brain injury for the following reason, these olfactory
neurons as I mention extend wires into the mucosa of the nose, but
they also extend a wire up into the skull. And they extend up into the
skull through what's called the cribriform plate, it's like a Swiss
cheese type plate where they're going through. And if you get a head
hit, that bone, the cribriform plate, sheers those little wires off
and those neurons die. Now, eventually they'll be replaced, but
there's a phenomenon by which concussion and the severity of
concussion and the recovery from a head injury can actually be gauged
in part, in part, not in whole, but in part by how well or fully one
recovers their sense of smell. So, if you're somebody that
unfortunately has suffered a concussion, your sense of smell is one
readout by which you might evaluate whether or not you're regaining
some of your sensory performance. Of course, there will be others like
balance, and cognition, and sleep, et cetera. But I'd like to refer
you to a really nice paper which is entitled Olfactory Dysfunction in
Traumatic Brain Injury: the Role of Neurogenesis the first author is
Marin, M-A-R-I-N. The paper was published in Current Allergy and
Asthma Report, this is 2020. I spent some time with this paper, it's
quite good, it's a review article, I like reviews if they're peer-
reviewed reviews and in quality journals. And what they discuss is and
I'll just read here briefly 'cause they said it better than I could,
"Olfactory functioning disturbances are common following traumatic
brain injury, TBI, and can have a significant impact on the quality of
life. Although there is no standard treatment for patients with the
loss of smell." Now I'm paraphrasing, "Post-injury olfactory training
has shown promise for beneficial effects. Some of this involves," they
go on to tell us the role of dopamine, dopaminergic signaling, as I
mentioned before, but what does this mean? This means that if you've
had a head injury or repeated head injuries that enhancing your sense
of smell is one way by which you can create new neurons. And now, you
know how to enhance your sense of smell by interacting with things
that have an odor very closely, and by essentially inhaling more,
focusing on the inhale to wake up the brain and to really focus on
some of the nuance of those smells. So, you might do for instance a
smell test by which you smell something like a lemon, put it down, do
10 inhales or so, smell again, et cetera. You might also just take a
more active role in trying to taste and smell your food, and taste and
smell various things. I mean, please don't ingest anything that's
poisonous that you're not supposed to be ingesting, but you know what
I mean, really tuning up this system, I think is an excellent review,
we're going to do an entire episode all about the use of the visual
system in particular, but also the olfactory system for treatment of
traumatic brain injury, as well as other methods. But I wanted to just
mention it here because a number of people asked me about TBI. And
here again, we're in this place where the senses and our ability to
sense these chemicals through these two holes in the front of our
face, our nostrils is a powerful readout and way to control brain
function and nervous system function generally.
Just a quick note about the use of smelling salts, I have a feeling
that some of you may be interested in that and its application. If you
are interested in that, I recommend you go to the scientific
literature first rather than straight to some vendor or to the what do
they call it these days? Costello bro science, he says, bro science,
the bro science. You can go to this paper, which is excellent and is
real science, which is Acute Effects of Ammonia Inhalants on Strength
and Power Performance in Trained Men. It's a randomized controlled
trial, it was published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research in 2018, and it should be very easy to find. I will provide a
link to the so-called PubMed ID, which is a string of numbers, and
we'll put that in the caption if you want to go straight to that
article, does show a significant what they call, this is what the
words they use literally in quotes, "psyching up effect through the
use of these ammonia inhalants and a significant increase in maximal
force in force development in a variety of different movements." So,
for those of you that are interested in ammonia inhalants, so-called
smelling salts, that might be a good reference.
The other thing I wanted to talk about with reference to odors is this
myth which is that we don't actually smell things in our dreams, that
we don't have a sense of smell. That's pure fiction, I don't know who
came up with that, it's very clear that we are capable of smelling
things in our sleep. However, when we are in REM sleep, rapid eye
movement sleep, which is the sleep that predominates toward the second
half of the night our ability to wake up in response to odors is
diminished. It's not absent, but it's diminished. If smoke comes into
the room, we will likely wake up if the concentration of smoke is high
enough regardless of the stage of sleep we're in, but in REM sleep we
tend to be less likely to smell, to sniff. And that actually was
measured in a number of studies that sniffing in sleep is possible.
So, if you put an odor like a lemon underneath someone's nostrils in
the early portion of the night, they will smell, and they will
later... They will sniff, excuse me, whether or not they smell or not,
I guess depends on them and when they showered last, but they will
definitely sniff and they will report later, especially if you wake
them up soon after that, they had a dream or a percept of the scent of
a lemon for instance. Later in the night, it's harder for that
relationship to be established, it's likely that because of some of
the paralysis associated with rapid eye movement sleep, which is a
healthy paralysis, so-called sleep atonia, you don't want to act out
your dreams in REM sleep that there is a less active tendency to
sniff. And actually this has real clinical implications, the ability
to sniff in response to the introduction of an odor is actually one
way in which clinicians assess whether or not somebody's brain is so-
called brain dead. That's not a nice term, but brain dead, or whether
or not they have the capacity to recover from things like coma and
other states of deep unconsciousness, or I guess you'd call it
subconsciousness. So, what will happen is if someone has an injury and
they're essentially out cold, the production of a sniffing reflex, or
a sniffing response to say a lemon or some other odor presented below
the nostrils is considered a sign that the brain is capable of waking
up. Now, that's not always the case, but it's one indication. So just
like you could use mechano sensation, so, a toe pinch for instance,
you know, or scraping the bottom of somebody's barefoot to see if
they're conscious, or shining light in their eyes, these are all
things that you've seen in movies and television, or maybe if you've
seen in real life as well. Well, odors and chemical sensing is another
way by which you can assess whether or not the brain is capable of
arousal. And actually olfactory stimulation is one of the more
prominent ones that's being used in various clinics. As a last point
about specific odors and compounds that can increase arousal and
alertness, and this was simply through sniffing them not through
ingesting them.
There are data, believe it or not, there are good data on peppermint
and the smell of peppermint, minty type sense, whether you like them
or not will increase attention, and they can create the same sort of
arousal response although not as intensely or as dramatically as
ammonia salts can for instance. By the way, please don't go sniff real
ammonia, you could actually damage your olfactory epithelium if you do
that too close to the ammonia. If you're going to use smelling salts
be sure you work with someone or you know what you're getting and how
you're using this. You can damage your olfactory pathway in ways that
are pretty severe, you can also damage your vision. If you've ever
teared up because you inhaled something that was really noxious, that
is not a good thing, it doesn't mean you necessarily cause damage, but
it means that you have irritated the mucosal lining and possibly even
the surfaces of your eyes, so please be very, very careful. Scents
like peppermint, like these ammonia smelling salts, the reason they
wake you up is because they trigger specific olfactory neurons that
communicate with the specific centers of the brain, namely the
amygdala and associated neurocircuitry and pathways that trigger
alertness of the same sort that a cold shower or an ice bath, or a
sudden surprise, or a stressful text message would evoke. Remember,
the systems of your body that produce arousal, and alertness, and
attention, and that cue you for optimal learning, aka focus. Those are
very general mechanisms, they involve very basic molecules like
adrenaline and epinephrin same thing actually, adrenaline and
epinephrin. The number of stimuli, whether it's peppermint or ammonia,
or a loud blast, the number of stimuli that can evoke that adrenaline
response and that wake up response are near infinite. And that's the
beauty of your nervous system, it was designed to take any variety of
different stimuli placed them into categories, and then evoke
different categories of very general responses. Now, you know a lot
about olfaction and how the sense of smell works, here's another
experiment that you can do.
I'll ask you right now. Do you like, hate, or are you indifferent to
the smell of microwave popcorn? Some people, including one member of
my podcast staff says it's absolutely disgusting to them, they feel
like it's completely nauseating. I don't mind it at all, in fact, I
kind of like it. I think the smell of a microwave popcorn is kind of
pleasant. I don't particularly like it, but it's certainly not
unpleasant. Some people have a gene that makes them sensitive to the
smell of things like microwave popcorn such that it smells like vomit.
I probably don't have that gene because I find the smell of microwaved
popcorn pretty pleasant. Some people hate the smell of cilantro, some
people ingest asparagus, and when they urinate they can smell the
asparagus in a very pungent way, other people can't smell it at all.
These are variants in genes that encode for what are called olfactory
receptors. Each olfactory sensory neuron expresses one odorant gene,
one gene that codes for a receptor that responds to a particular odor.
If you don't have that gene you will not respond to that odor. So, the
reason why some people find the smell of microwave popcorn to be very
noxious, putrid in fact, is because they have a gene that allows them
to smell the kind of putrid odor within that. Other people who lack
that gene just simply can't smell it, so we are not all the same with
respect to our sensory experience. What one person finds delicious,
another person might find disgusting. I'll give a good example which
is that I absolutely despise Gorgonzola and blue cheese, absolutely
despise it, it smells and tastes like dirty moldy socks to me. Some
people love it, they crave it, actually, some people get a visceral
response to it, and we will talk about how certain tastes can actually
evoke very deep biological responses, even hormonal responses when we
talk about taste in a few minutes. But there are these odors, for
instance in popcorn it's the molecule 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, not
proline but pyrroline, that gives off to some people like me a toasted
smell as the sugars in the kernels heat, but the compound is also
found in things like white bread and jasmine rice, which don't have as
pungent an odor, but some people smell that and it smells like cat
urine. Now, there are scents like musky scents and musty scents that
are secreted by animals like skunks and other animals of the so-called
Mustelidae family. So, these would be ferrets and other animals that
can spray in response to fear, or if they just want to mark a
territory because they want to say that's mine. Dogs incidentally have
scent glands that they rub on things, cats have them too. This musty
odor, some people find actually quite pleasant, some people find it to
be very noxious and that will depend of course on the concentration,
right?
I'll never forget the first time Costello got sprayed by a skunk and
it was awful. I actually don't mind the smell of skunk at a distance,
it's actually a little bit pleasant, I admit it's a little bit
pleasant to me. I don't think that makes me too weird because if you
ever read the book "All Quiet on the Western Front" about World War I,
there's a description in there about the smell of skunk at a distance
being mildly pleasant, so the author of that book probably shared a
similar olfactory profile to me, or I to them rather, but some people
find even the tiniest bit of the smell of skunk or musk to be noxious
or awful. Now, of course in high concentrations, it's really awful.
And unfortunately, poor Costello, he was like literally red-eyed and
just snorting, and it was awful. There's a joke about dogs that says
that dogs either get skunked one time and never again or 50 or a
hundred times. Costello has been skunked no fewer, I'm not making this
up, has been skunked no fewer than 103 times. And that's because if he
sees something or hears something in the bushes, he just goes straight
in, he does not learn. But if you like this, that musty scent or musky
scent, well that says something about the genes that you express in
your olfactory neurons, it is completely inherited. And if you don't
like that scent, if it's really noxious or you have this response to
microwave popcorn, well, that means you have a different compliment, a
different constellation if you will of genes that make up for these
olfactory sensory neurons and the receptors that they express. Let's
talk about taste. Not whether or not you have taste or you don't have
taste, there's no way for me to assess that, but rather how we taste
things, meaning how we sense chemicals in food and in drink.
There are essentially five, but scientists now believe there may be
six things that we taste alone or in combination, they are sweet
tastes, salty tastes, bitter tastes, sour tastes, and umami taste.
Most of you probably heard of umami by now, it's U-M-A-M-I. Umami is
actually the name for a particular receptor that you express on your
tongue that detects savory tastes, so it's the kind of thing in
braised meats. Sometimes people can even get the activation of umami
by tomatoes or tomato sauces. What are each of these tastes and taste
receptors responsible for? And then we'll talk about the sixth, maybe
you can guess what it is, I don't know if you can guess it now. I
couldn't guess it, but of the five tastes each one has a specific
utility or function. Each one has a particular group of neurons in
your mouth, in your tongue, believe it or not, that responds to
particular chemicals and particular chemical structures. It is a total
myth, complete fiction, that different parts of your tongue harbor
different taste receptors. You know, that high school textbook diagram
that you know sweet is in one part of the tongue and sour is in
another, and bitters in another, complete fiction, just total fiction
related to very old studies that were performed in a very poorly
controlled way, no serious biologists and certainly no one that works
on tastes would contend that that's the way that the taste receptors
are organized, they are completely intermixed along your tongue. If
you have heightened or decreased sensitivity to one of those five
things I mentioned; sweet, salty, bitter, umami, or sour at one
location in your tongue, it likely reflects the density of overall
receptors or something going on in your brain, but not the
differential distribution of those receptors. So, the sweet receptors
are neurons that express a receptor that respond to sugars, in the
same way that you have cones, photoreceptors, in your eye that respond
to short, medium, or long wavelength light, meaning blueish, greenish,
or reddish light. You have a neuron, or neurons plural, in your tongue
that respond to sugars. And then those neurons, they don't say sweet,
they don't actually send any sugar into the brain, they send what we
call a volley, a barrage of action potentials of electrical signals
off into the brain. It's an amazing system. So, all these receptors in
your tongue make up what are called the neurons that give rise to a
nerve, a collection of wires, nerve bundles of what's called the
gustatory nerve, it goes from the tongue to the so-called nucleus of
the solitary tract. And some of you requested names, I usually don't
like to include too many names for sake of clarity, but the gustatory
nerve from the tongue goes to the nucleus of the solitary tract and
then to the thalamus and to insular cortex. You don't have to remember
any of those names if you don't want to, but if you want mechanism,
you want neural circuits, that's the circuit, gustatory nerve from the
tongue, nucleus of the solitary tract in the brainstem, then the
thalamus, and then insular cortex. And it is in insular cortex, this
regenerate cortex that we sort out and make sense of and perceive the
various tastes. Now, it's amazing because just taking a little bit of
sugar or something sour like a little bit of lemon juice and touching
it to the tongue within 100 milliseconds, right? Just 100
milliseconds, far less than one second, you can immediately
distinguish ah, that's sour, that sweet, that's bitter, that's umami,
and that's an assessment that's made by the cortex. Now, what to these
different five receptors encode for?
Well, sweet, salty, bitter, umami, sour, but what are they really
looking for? What are they sensing? Well, sweet stuff signals the
presence of energy, of sugars. And while we're all trying or we're
told that we should eat less sugar for a variety of reasons, the
ability to sense whether or not a food has rapid energy source or
could give rise to glucose is essential so we have sweet receptors.
The salty receptors, these neurons are trying to sense whether or not
there are electrolytes in a given food or drink. Electrolytes are
vitally important for the function of our nervous system, and for our
entire body, sodium is what allows neurons to fire. What allows them
to be electrically active. We also need potassium and magnesium, those
are the ions that allow the neurons to be active. So the salty
receptors, the reason that they are there is to make sure that we are
getting enough, but not too much salt, we don't want to ingest things
that are far too salty. Bitter receptors are there to make sure we
don't ingest things that are poisonous. How do I know this? How can I
say that? Even though I was definitely not consulted at the design
phase, how can I say that? Well, the bitter receptors create a what we
call labeled line, a unique trajectory to the neurons of the brainstem
that control the [gags], the gag reflex. If we taste something very
bitter it automatically triggers the gag reflex. Now, some people like
bitter taste, I actually liked the taste of bitter coffee, children
generally like sweet tastes more than bitter tastes, but even babies
if they taste something bitter, they'll just immediately spit it up,
it's like the gag reflex. Putrid smells will also evoke the same
neurons, so some people are very sensitive, they have a very sensitive
or low threshold vomit reflex, you're going to and there was somebody
in my lab early on. And we never did this intentionally, and we're
just laughing 'cause it was so dramatic. How we would have a
discussion, someone would say something about something kind of gross,
appropriate for the workplace, but nonetheless gross, we are
biologists, would say something and they would say, "Stop, stop stop,
I'm going to throw up." You know and some people have a very low
threshold quick gag reflex. Other people don't, other people have a
very stable stomach, they don't, you know, they rarely, if ever vomit.
The umami receptor isn't sensing savory because the body loves savory,
it's because savory is a signal for the presence of amino acids. And
we'll talk more about this, but the presence of amino acids in our gut
and in our digestive system, and the presence of fatty acids is
essential, there is in fact, no essential carbohydrate or sugar. Now,
I'm not a huge proponent of ketogenic diets nor am I against them, I
think it's highly individual, you have to decide what's right for you,
but everybody needs amino acids to survive, the brain needs them and
we need fatty acids, especially to build a healthy brain during
development, you need amino acids and fatty acids. And the sour
receptor, why would we have a sour receptor? So, that we could have
those really like sour candies? I think they've gotten more and more
sour over the years. I admit I don't eat candy much, but I do have a
particular weakness for like a really good really sour like gummy
peach or they if the gummy cherries are dipped in whatever that sour
powder, so I was a kid who I admit it, I liked the LIK-M-AID thing,
I'd like drink the powder. Please don't do this, don't give this
garbage to your kids, but I liked it, it was tasty, but sour receptors
are not there so that you can ingest gummy sour gummy peaches or
something like that, that's not why the system evolved, it's there and
we know it's there to detect the presence of spoiled or fermented
food. Fermented fruit has a sour element to it, and fermented things
while certainly some fermented foods like sauerkraut, and kimchi, and
things of that sort can be very healthy for us and are very healthy in
reducing inflammation, there's great data on that, pro quality
microbiome, et cetera. Fermented fruit can be poisonous, right?
Alcohols are poisonous in many forms to our system and the sour
receptor bearing neurons communicate to an area of the brainstem that
evokes the pucker response, closing of the eyes and essentially
shutting of the mouth, and cringing away. I think cringe is like a
thing now, my niece, whenever I seem to say something or do something
it's either an eye-roll, a cringe, or both in combination. So the
sour, the sweet, the salty, the bitter, and the umami system, were not
there so that we could have this wonderful pallet of foods that we
enjoy so much, they'll allow us to do that, but they're there to make
sure that we bring in certain things to our system and that we don't
ingest other things. Now, what's the sixth sense within the taste
system?
Not sixth sense generally, but within the taste system. What's this
putative possible sixth receptor? I already kind of hinted at it when
I talked about fatty acids, there are now data to support the idea
although there's still more work that needs to be done that we also
have receptors on our tongue that sense fat. And that because fat is
so vital for the function of our nervous system and the other organs
of our body that we are sensing the fat content in food, maybe this is
why I can only eat half, but no less than half of a jar of almond
butter or peanut butter in one sitting. I just can't, unless it's not
salted, in which case, it makes no sense to me. But it's remarkable
how that texture, and also the flavor, but that texture of fat. I love
butter, I am guilty, and Costello is definitely guilty of eating pats
of butter from time to time, I have no guilt about this. People eat
pats of cheese, why shouldn't we eat a pat of butter? If you think
that's gross then maybe I have a greater abundance of the fat
receptors in my tongue, maybe I have a fat tongue than you do. But
nonetheless, the ability to sense fat here in our mouth seems to be
critical, you can imagine why that is. I want to talk about the tongue
and the mouth as an extension of your digestive tract.
I know that might not be pleasant to think about, but when you look at
it through the lens that I'm about to provide, it will completely
change the way you think about the gut brain and about all the stuff
that you've heard in these recent years about oh, we have this second
brain, it's all these neurons in our gut, I've been chuckling through
these last few years as people have gotten so excited about the gut
brain, not because of their excitement, I think that excitement is
wonderful, but we always knew that the nervous system extended out of
the brain and into the body, and people seem kind of overwhelmed and
surprised by the idea that we have neurons in our gut that can sense
things like sugars and fatty acids. And I think those are beautiful
discoveries, don't get me wrong. Diego Bohorquez's lab out of Duke
University has done beautiful studies showing that within the mucosal
lining of our gut we have neurons that sense fatty acids, sugars, and
amino acids, and that when we ingest something that contains one or
two or three of those things, there's a signal sent via the vagus
nerve up into what's called the nodose ganglion, N-O-D-O-S-E, and then
into the brain where it secretes dopamine which makes us want more of
that thing, it makes us more motivated to pursue and eat more of that
thing, that's either fatty, or umami, savory, or has a sweet taste,
any one or two or three of those qualities, independent of the taste.
Now, I think those are beautiful data, but we know that this thing,
the mouth. And for those of you listening I've just got my couple of
fingers in my mouth, that's why I sound like I've got something in my
mouth. This thing in the front of our face, we use it for speaking,
but it is the front of our digestive tract. We are essentially a
series of tubes and that tube starts with your mouth and heads down
into your stomach. And so, that you would sense so much of the
chemical constituents of the stuff that you might bring into your body
or that you might want to expel and not swallow or not interact with
by being able to smell is it putrid? Does it smell good? Does it taste
good? Is this safe? Is it salty? Is it so sour that it's fermented and
it's going to poison me? Is it so bitter that it could poison me? Is
it so savory that, mmm, yes. I want more and more of this. Well, then
you'd want to trigger dopamine, that's all starting in the mouth. So,
you have to understand that you were equipped with this amazing
chemical sensing apparatus, we call your mouth and your tongue. And
those little bumps on your tongue that they call the papillae, those
are not your taste buds. Surrounding those little papillae like little
rivers are these little dents and indentations. And what dents and
indentations do in a tissue is they allow more surface area, they
allow you to pack more receptors. So, down in those grooves are where
all these little neurons and their little processes are with these
little receptors for sweet, salty, bitter, umami, sour, and maybe fat
as well. And so, it's this incredible device that you've been equipped
with, that you can use to interact with various components of the
outside world and decide whether or not you want to bring them in or
not. Just as you can lose those olfactory neurons, if you happen to
get hit on the head or you have some other thing, maybe it was an
infection that caused loss of those olfactory sensory neurons, you can
also lose taste receptors in your mouth. If you've ever eaten
something that's too hot, not spicy hot, but too hot, you burn your
tongue, you burn receptors. It takes about a week to recover those
receptors. For some people it's a little bit more quickly, but if you
burn your tongue badly by ingesting a soup that's too hot or a
beverage that's too hot, you will greatly reduce your sense of taste
for essentially all tastes. And that's because those neurons sit very
shallow beneath the tongue's surface, and so that if you put something
too hot on, you literally just burn those neurons away. Luckily those
neurons also can replenish themselves. Those neurons are of the
peripheral nervous system, and like all peripheral system neurons they
can replenish or regenerate. So, if you burn your mouth in about a
week or so hopefully sooner you'll be able to taste again. In fact,
everybody's ability to taste is highly subject to training. You can
really enhance your ability to taste and taste the different component
parts of different foods simply by paying attention to what you're
trying to taste, this is an amazing aspect of the taste system.
I think more than any other system, the taste system and perhaps the
smell system as well can be trained so that you can learn to pick out
the tones, if you will of different ice cream, or different beverages.
I'm somebody who, you know, I don't drink much alcohol, I'll
occasionally have a drink or something, but a while ago I got to taste
a bunch of different white tequilas, these are different kinds of
tequilas that are, they're not brown, they're white. And I sort of
assumed that all tequila was disgusting, that was my assumption before
doing this. And then I tasted a couple of white tequilas and I
realized oh, those aren't aren't too bad. I tasted a few more, and
then pretty soon I could really start to detect the nuance and the
difference. Now, I haven't had a tequilas in a long time, now I sort
of tend to not drink at all these days, but in a very short period of
time like a couple of days I got very good at detecting which things I
liked and I could start to pick out tones. So, I'm not a wine drinker,
but for those of you that are, you know, you hear about oh, it has
floral tones, or berry tones, or chocolate tones. You know, some of
that is just kind of menu-based and kind of marketing-based silliness
designed to get you excited about what you're about to ingest. But
some of it is real, and for people that are skilled in assessing wines
or assessing foods. I'm much more of an eater than a drinker, you can
really start to develop a sensitive palate, a nuanced palette through
what we call top-down mechanisms. This olfactory cortex that takes
these five, maybe the sixth fat receptor too, information and tries to
make sense of what's out there in the world. And what its utility is,
is it good? Is it bad? Do I want more of it or less than it? That
neural circuitry is unlike other neural circuitry in that it seems
very amenable to behavioral plasticity for whatever reason, and we
could talk about what those reasons might be. You know, it's
interesting sometimes to think about how your taste literally,
chemical taste, is probably very different than that of other people,
how a food tastes to you is probably very different than how it tastes
to somebody else. The same probably cannot be said of something like
vision or hearing, unless you're somebody who has perfect pitch or
your color vision is disrupted, or you're a mantis shrimp, chances are
when we look at the same object two people are seeing more or less the
same object or perceiving it in a very similar way. There are
experiments that essentially establish that. Now we, have taste
receptors and a lot of those tastes receptors, their chemical
structures are known, they come with fancy names like the T1R1 or the
T1R2, which were identified as the sweet and umami receptors.
So, what's interesting is that this umami flavor is the savory flavor
rather that's sensed by umami receptors is very close to the receptor
that detects sweet things. Similarly, bitter is sensed by a whole
other set of receptors. Now, there's a fun naturally occurring
experiment that will forever change the way that you look at animals,
and the way certainly that I think about dogs and Costello in
particular. Carnivorous large animals like tigers and some grizzly
bears for instance, we know that they have no ability to detect sweet,
they don't actually have the receptors for sweet on their tongue, but
their concentration of umami receptors of their ability to detect
savory is at least 5,000 times that which it is in humans. In other
words, if I eat a little piece of steak, or Costello eats a little
piece of steak, that steak probably tastes much, much more savory than
it does to me. So dogs, and tigers, and bears, et cetera, they're
going to taste savory things and smell savory things with a much
higher degree of sensitivity, but they can't taste sweet things. Other
large animals, which are mostly herbivores like the panda bear for
instance. It's hard to believe that thing is even a bear, I got
nothing against pandas, I just think that they get a little bit too
much of the limelight frankly. So, no vendetta against Panda, save the
pandas, I hope they replenish all the pandas, but pandas in all their
whatever have no umami receptors, they can't taste savory, but they
have greatly heightened density of sweet receptors. So, there they are
eating these whatever bamboos all day or not bamboozle, but bamboos
all day and they can taste things that are very sweet with a much
higher degree of intensity. And in general, animals that are more
gentle that are herbivores, excuse me. Or animals that have the
propensity for aggression, that's where you really see the divergence
of the umami receptor because it's associated with meat and amino
acids. And where you see the enhancement of the sweet receptors for
animals that eat a lot of plants and fruits, and they probably taste
very different to them than they do to you and me. And, so it's
interesting to note that animals that eat meat, that eat other
organisms can actually extract more savory experience from that. What
does this mean for you? All right, do you associate yourself as a
tiger, or a grizzly bear, or a panda, or a combination of both?
Most people are omnivores. However, you may find it interesting that
people that for instance eat a pure carnivore type diet or a keto diet
where they are ingesting a lot of meat, so therefore are sensing a lot
of umami flavors. And I realized not everyone who's keto eats meat,
but those who do that will develop a more sensitive palate and likely
there are some data, although early data, craving for umami-like
foods. Whereas people that eat a more plant-based diet are likely
developing a heightened sensitivity and desire for, and maybe even
dopamine response to sugars and plant-based foods. Now, this is my
partial attempt to reconcile the kind of online battle that seems to
exist between plant-based versus animal-based, purely plant-based or
purely animal-based diets. I think most people are omnivores, but it's
kind of interesting to think that the systems are plastic such that
people might want more meat if they eat more meat, people might want
more plants if they eat enough plants for a long period of time. And
this might explain some of the chasm that exists between these two
groups. Now, this is not to say anything about the ethical or the
environmental impacts of different things, I don't even want to get
into that because the meat people say that the plant-based diets have
as much a negative impact as the plant people say that the meat based
diets, that's a totally different discussion. What I'm talking about
here is food craving and food seeking and one's ability to detect
these umami, savory flavors is going to be enhanced by ingesting more
meat and less activation of the sweet receptors. So in other words,
the more meat you eat the more you're going to become like a tiger, so
to speak. And the more that you avoid these umami flavors and meats
and the more that you would eat plant-based foods and in particular
sweet foods, the more you will likely suppress that umami system and
that you will have a heightened desire for, appetite for and sensing
of sweet foods or foods that contain sugars. What I'm about to tell
you is going to seem crazy, but is extremely interesting with respect
to taste and taste receptors.
Remember, even though we can enjoy food and we can evolve our sense of
what's tasty or not tasty, depending on life decisions, environmental
changes, et cetera, the taste system just like the olfactory system
and the visual system was laid down for the purpose of moving towards
things that are good for us and moving away from things that are bad
for us, that's the kind of core function of the nervous system. Well,
taste receptors are not just expressed on the tongue, they are
expressed in other cells and other tissues as well. Some of you may be
able to imagine foods that are so delicious to you that they make your
entire body feel good. Or foods that are so horrifically awful to
think about let alone taste, that they create a whole body shuddering
or kind of repellent-type response where you just either cringe or
turn your face away even in the absence of that food. That's sort of
how I feel about pungent, Gorgonzola cheese. If you like Gorgonzola
cheese, I don't judge you, I just, that's an individual difference. I
happen to love certain foods, I do like savory foods very much. I,
when I think about them, they just they make me feel good. And I'm
oftentimes not even associating with the taste of those foods, it
feels almost like a visceral thing. Well, it turns out that some of
the taste receptors extend beyond the tongue, that they actually can
extend into portions of the gut and digestive system. And if that's
not strange enough, turns out that some of the taste receptors are
actually expressed on the ovaries and the testes. So, what that means
is that the gonads, the very cells, and tissues, and organs in our
body that make up the reproductive axis are expressing taste
receptors. Okay, so how do we interpret this? Does this mean that when
you eat something that's very savory or very sweet for instance, that
it's triggering activation of the ovaries or of the testes? Well, it's
possible. Now, how those molecules, those chemical molecules would
actually get there isn't clear, the digestive track does not run
directly to the testes or to the ovaries. But nonetheless, what this
means is that chemical sensing of the very things that we detect on
our tongue and that we call taste in quotes in food is also evoking
cellular responses within the reproductive gonads. Now, whether or not
this underlies the positive association that we have with certain
foods isn't clear, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point out the
obvious, which is that the relationship between the sensual nature of
particular foods and sensuality generally and the reproductive axis is
something that's been covered in many movies, there are entire movies
that are focused on the relationship between for instance, chocolate
and love and reproductive behaviors, or certain feasts of meat and
their wonderful tastes and the kind of sensuality around feasts of
different types of foods, but in general, it's the sweet and the
savory, rarely is it the sour or the bitter, the salty or the fat.
And not surprisingly perhaps, it is the T2Rs and the T1Rs, the
receptors that are associated with the sweet and with the umami, the
savory flavors that are expressed not just on the tongue and in
portions of the digestive tract, but on the gonads themselves. So,
what does this mean? Does this mean that eating certain foods can
stimulate the gonads? Maybe, there's no data that immediately support
that right now, but this is an emerging area. If you'd like to read
more about this there's a great review, entitled Taste perception:
From the tongue to the testis, although they do also talk about the
ovaries. Why they didn't include that in the title is I think a
reflection of the bias of the author. The author indeed not
incidentally is Feng Li, last name L-I. It's a very interesting paper
published in Molecular Human Reproduction. You can find it easily
online, it's downloadable, I'll also provide a link to it. I just
think it's fascinating that these taste receptors are expressed in
other tissues. And I should mention that they're expressed in tissues
of other areas of the body as well, including the respiratory system,
but the richest aggregation or concentration of these receptors for
umami and sweet of course is on the tongue, but also on the gonads.
And I think it does speak to the possible bridge between what we think
of as a sensory or a sensual experience of food and the deeper kind of
visceral sense within the gut, and maybe even within the gonads as
well of something that we find extremely pleasurable, or even
appetitive that we want to move toward it. We are actually going to
return to that general theme in the discussion about touch sensation.
Some people for instance, when they touch certain surfaces like furs,
or sheep skins, or velvet, or soft, smooth surfaces it feels good
elsewhere in their body, not just at the point of contact with that
surface. And similarly, if there's the... How about this one? The
screech of chalk on a chalkboard, it's a sound, but it has a very
strong visceral component, or sandpaper, like fingernails on a
chalkboard, not the sound, but the feeling, right? Exactly, so our
whole nervous system is tuned to either be drawn toward appetitive, or
repelled by aversive behaviors, right? So there's this push-pull that
exists, and what I'm referring to in terms of these receptors on the
tongue that are also expressed on the gonads is yet another example of
what at least in this case seems to be an appetitive thing, a desire
to move toward certain foods and maybe even the experiences that are
associated with those foods. I want to talk about a particular aspect
of food and a chemical reaction in cooking called the Maillard
reaction.
Some of you have probably heard of the Maillard reaction, it's spelled
M-A-I-L-L-A-R-D. The D is silent, so don't call it the Maillard
reaction, and it's not the Maillard reaction, it is the Maillard
reaction. And the Maillard reaction is a reaction that for the
aficionados is a non-enzymatic browning. The other form of non-
enzymatic browning is caramelization, although when you hear caramel,
carmel, I think it's caramel. You think sweet, and indeed
caramelization is a sugar-sugar chemical interaction that leads to a
kind of nicely toasted not burnt, but nicely toasted sweet taste.
Whereas the Maillard reaction is that really savory reaction that
occurs when you have a sugar amino acid reaction. Remember, we have
neurons in our gut, but also neurons in our tongue and neurons deep in
the brain that are comparing the amount of sugar to savory. Okay, and
the Maillard reaction is very interesting for you chemists out there,
this is going to be way too elementary. And for you non-chemists it's
probably going to be a little bit of a reach, but just bear with me,
all these chemicals that we sense have a different structure, it's
like hydrogens, and oxygens, and aldehyde groups, and all these
things. And basically the Maillard reaction involves what's called a
free aldehyde. If you didn't like chemistry, don't worry about it,
it's basically got a group there that kind of sits open that allows it
to interact with other things and actually through the use of heat and
the process that we call brazing, which I'll talk about in a moment
you create a what's called a ketone group. Now, most people now have
heard of ketones 'cause they think about the ketogenic diet, but a
ketone group is actually a chemical compound that can be used for
energy, and that's why people say you can use ketones for energy, but
if you've ever actually encountered ketones, if you for instance, get
liquid ketones, a ketone ester, and you smell it, what does it smell
like? It smells a little bit like an alcohol, but it has a kind of
savory taste, even when you smell it. Okay, there are other smells
that have these tastes too, but for the Maillard reaction which could
be created for instance like if you took a piece of meat, or if you're
not a meat eater if you took tomatoes and you cook them in a pan and
you cooked it nice and slow till it's simmered and almost started to
brown and burn a little bit. Usually if I do it burns, I'm not a good
cook as Costello points out a lot, but it gets that like almost tangy,
very umami-like flavor. And sometimes it will even stick to the pan,
if you scrape it off and actually you can taste it in your mouth as
you're cooking it. That's the Maillard reaction, that's that free
aldehyde group, and that's the production of a ketone group. When you
smell ketones, it smells very much like that. Okay, some people talk
about the ketones will produce like fruity breath. And that's true if
people are really far into ketosis, their breath has a kind of fruity
odor, that's a little bit of a different thing. So, the relationship
between smell and taste is a very, very close one. And this is why
when people drink wine they often will inhale and then sip, some of
that is just kind of like pomp and circumstance frankly, they make a
big deal of it, but they can sense things with their mouth. The
combination of odor receptors being activated in a particular way, and
taste receptors in the mouth being activated in a particular way,
triggers the activation of multiple brain areas that are associated
with taste, and circuitry within the body that's associated with the
behaviors that relate to that taste like leaning toward it, or leaning
away from it depending on whether or not it's appetitive or aversive.
So the Maillard reaction is a very interesting reaction involving this
sugar amino acid thing, but really it's what it's doing is heating up
food such that the amino acids are more available literally in their
chemical form for detection by the neurons. This is a phenomenon that
occurs in other domains of the taste system. For instance, a lot of
what's happened with highly processed foods is that manufacturers have
figured out how to trigger more dopamine response by ingestion of
these sugary foods and created textures, and created essentially
design of foods for two purposes. I'm not out to completely demonize
processed food, I did that in a previous episode, but processed foods
are really designed to take foods that ordinarily would spoil, that
would have a shelf life and extend their shelf life to turn foods
which are not a commodity into a commodity. Something could be stored
and used essentially as a tradable purchasable, sellable resource. In
doing that they change, they've also decided to change the texture so
that you want to chew more of them. Like I have this thing I don't
know what it is for those Triscuit crackers. I don't know why are
those things so good? It's probably the texture, got those layers,
they're just kind of perfectly salty. I haven't had one in a long
time, so I bet if I had one now it wouldn't taste as good as I'm
imagining it. But those combinations of texture, smell, and taste are
what combine to activate these different brain areas that make you
really want to desire something. And the people who make foods,
processed foods in particular, are phenomenally good at figuring out
what drives the dopamine system and makes you want more of these
things either because of the way they taste and/or because of the way
they trigger neurons in your gut that have nothing to do with taste
that simply make you desire more of the food.
In other words, many of the foods that are processed foods make you
desire more of them, it's impossible to eat one chip kind of thing.
Not because they taste good, but because in your gut they're
activating the neurons that activate dopamine which make you seek more
of those foods independent of blood sugar or anything else. So, you
may actually be eating more particular foods not because they taste
good, but because they feel good on your tongue and mouth, and because
the neurons in your gut which are totally independent of conscious
taste are triggering the release of dopamine which is a molecule that
makes you seek more of, and do more of anything that led to the
ingestion of that food.
There's a fun experiment that you can do, which is to completely
invert your sense of sweet and sour, there's actually a way to do this
readily. When I was a post-doc, I used to have a journal club at my
house, people would come over in the evening once a month, and we
would read a paper, typically the weirdest paper we could find and we
would eat food and hang out, that's what nerds did and do for fun, so
that's what we did. And one time someone brought what's called miracle
berry. Okay, so this isn't some psychedelic plant medicine thing,
miracle berry, you can purchase online, it's relatively inexpensive.
It actually causes a change in the configuration of taste receptors
such that when you eat something sour, it tastes sweet. And so what's
really wild is you ingest miracle berry, and then you bite into a
lemon, maybe even the lemon and peel and it tastes as sweet as a
peach. And this effect lasts several hours. Definitely, you know,
check any warnings, I don't know what sort of warnings these, a
miracle berry carries, but I'm sure there's always something, you can
imagine. There are a number of papers on miracle berry or miracle
fruit it's called, but it changes your perception of sour at a
perceptual level, but it does that by changing the activity of the
receptors in the mouth and tongue. Now, this is important as a
principle and it's underscored by experiments that have been done by
for instance Charles Zuker's lab at Columbia University, where they've
essentially genetically engineered animals such that the bitter
receptor is swapped with the sweet receptor, or the sweet receptor is
swapped with the bitter receptor. And what they show is that the
actual food, the experience on the tongue drives different pathways in
the brain. Here's what they did, they essentially took mice and
swapped out the sweet receptor and put in a bitter receptor. And then
what they found is that whereas normally mice would actively seek out
and even work for sugar water, sucrose, they really like that. If they
replace the sweet receptor with the bitter receptor, the mice would
avoid sugar water. And the reverse was also true, that mice would
drink a bitter solution avidly, they liked a bitter solution if they
swapped out the bitter receptor for sweet receptor. What this means is
that our entire experience of what we taste is dependent on how we
experience that taste the level of the tongue. And so, you're
hopefully not going to do genetic engineering of your taste receptors,
but if you'd like to do this sort of experiment you actually can do it
very easily using miracle fruit, the instructions of how much to
ingest, et cetera, any safety concerns are usually on the package and
should be easy to find. And there's a lot of science to support how
this works, it's kind of a fun experiment that anyone can do and will
completely change your perception of any food that you're accustomed
to eating. In fact, you can figure out how much sweet or the sense of
sweetness is contributing to your experience of a food, even if you
don't think of it as a sweet food through this miracle fruit
experiment. You could take miracle fruit, you could eat a slice of
pepperoni pizza or cheese pizza, which perhaps normally to you would
taste just like pizza, and you'll notice it tastes very different.
What you are detecting is how much the sense of sweet was contributing
to that particular flavor.
Now, I'd like to return to pheromones. As I mentioned earlier, true
pheromonal effects are well-established in animals. And one of the
most remarkable pheromone effects that's ever been described is one
that actually I've mentioned before on this podcast, but I'll mention
again just briefly, which is the Coolidge effect. The Coolidge effect
is the effect of a male of a given species, in most cases, it tended
to be a rodent or a rooster mating. And at some point reaching
exhaustion or the inability to mate again because they just simply
couldn't for whatever reason. The Coolidge effect establishes that if
you swap out the hen with a new hen, or the female rat or mouse with a
new one then the rat or the rooster spontaneously regains their
ability to mate, somehow their vigor is returned, the refractory
period after mating that normally occurs is abolished and they can
mate again. It turns out that the Coolidge effect runs in the opposite
direction too. I did not know this, but I recently learned of a study,
it was actually done in hamsters, not in in mice, but it turns out
that females also will, female rodents will mate to exhaustion. And at
some port... At some point, excuse me, they will refuse to mate any
longer unless you swap in a new male. And then because mating in
rodents involves the female being receptive, there are certain number
of behaviors that mean that tell you that she's willing and wanting to
mate, so-called lordosis reflex. Then if there's a new male, she will
spontaneously regain the lordosis reflex and the desire to mate. And
how do you know this? How do we know it's a pheromonal effect? Well,
this recovery of the desire and ability to mate both in males and in
females can be evoked completely by the odor of a new male or female,
it doesn't even have to be the presentation of the actual animal. And
that's how you know that it's not some visual interaction or some
other interaction, it's a pheromonal interaction. Now, as I mentioned
earlier, pheromonal effects in humans have been debated for a long
period of time. We are thought to have a vestigial, meaning a kind of
shrunken down miniature accessory olfactory bulb called Jacobson's
organ, or the vomeronasal organ. Some people don't believe that
Jacobson's organ exists, some people do, there is anatomical evidence
for it in some cadavers. It sits not very high up in the brain or
where your olfactory bulb is, but it's actually in the nasal passages,
so there's like little dents as you go up through your nasal passages,
and there is evidence of something that's vomeronasal-like.
Vomeronasal is the pheromonal organ, they call it Jacobson's organ if
it's present in humans, kind of tucked into some of the divots in the
nasal passage. Even if that organ, Jacobson's organ isn't there or is
not responsible for the chemical signaling between individuals, there
is chemical signaling between human beings. As I mentioned earlier,
the effect of tears in suppressing the areas of the brain that are
involved in sexual desire and testosterone of males, that's a concrete
result, that's a very good result published by an excellent group with
no pre-existing bias going in, that's just what they found. There is
also evidence both for and against chemical signaling between females
in terms of synchronization of menstrual cycles.
Now, the original paper on this was published in the 1970s by
McClintock, and it essentially said that when women live together in
group housing, dormitories, and similar that their menstrual cycles
were synchronized and that was due to what was hypothesized to be
pheromonal effects. Over the years, that study has been challenged
many, many times. The more recent data point to the idea that there is
chemical-chemical signaling between women in ways that impact the
timing of the menstrual cycle, but that depending on whether or not
some of the women are in the ovulation phase, the ovulatory phase of
that cycle or whether or not they are in the follicular phase, the
phase when the follicle is maturing before the egg actually obviates.
So two separate phases of the 28 day menstrual cycle will either
lengthen or shorten the menstrual cycle of the person that smells
those women. Translated into English what that means is that it is
very likely it seems that something, maybe pheromones, but maybe some
other chemical that is independent of pheromones is being conveyed
between women that are housed together or spend a lot of time together
to shift their menstrual cycle, but it doesn't necessarily mean that
they synchronize. So for instance, if one woman is in the follicular
phase of the menstrual cycle, it might shorten or delay ovulation.
Excuse me, it might accelerate ovulation in another woman, whereas if
somebody is in the ovulatory phase of their cycle, it might lengthen
the menstrual cycle out so that they, the woman who smells that
person's scent or who smells her sweat, we still don't know the origin
of the chemical would ovulate later. So, all of this is to say is that
chemical-chemical signaling is happening from females to males through
tears, we know that. Is that a pheromonal effect? Well, by the strict
definition of a pheromone, a molecule that's released from one
individual that impacts the biology of another individual, yes. But in
terms of identifying what the pheromone is in tears, that's still
unknown, it's not clear what the chemical compound is. So, we're
reluctant as scientists to call it a true pheromonal effect. The
menstrual cycle and the synchronization of the menstrual cycle effect
seems to hold up under some conditions. But in some cases, there's a
kind of clash of menstrual cycles that's created by chemicals that are
emitted from one female to another. So, there are many examples of
this in humans, for instance, people can recognize the t-shirt of
their mate.
If you give... This experiment has been done many times, I know it's
been challenged a number of times, but the data are pretty good by now
that if you offer, you take a collection of women who are in stable
relationships with somebody, you offer them the smell of a hundred
different shirts and they can very readily pick out their significant
others scent. Okay, that's pure olfaction, that's not pheromonal, but
nonetheless is a remarkable degree of discrimination, olfactory
discrimination. You can dilute their partner's scent down to the point
where they themselves can't consciously detect the difference between
the sweat or the t-shirt of a hundred different t-shirts or so, they
might say, "I don't really smell the difference, but I think it's this
one. Yeah, this one belongs to the person that I've been with." And
they are much greater than chance at detecting the t-shirt or
identifying the t-shirt correctly. So, there's no question really that
there is chemical-chemical signaling between humans, the question is
whether or not it's truly pheromonal in basis. Now, you'll notice that
a lot of the examples I gave aside from the one of tears is women
detecting the scents of men or of other women.
And it turns out that there are a number of papers, the best one I
think that I could find is published in Physiology and Behavior in
2009, it's a review entitled Sex Differences and Reproductive Hormone
Influences on Human Odor Perception by Doty, D-O-T-Y, and Cameron. I
encourage you to check out this review it's available free as a
download, we'll provide a link to it, you can get the full PDF if you
want. But it does seem that women are better at detecting odors in
these odor discrimination tasks than are men. And yes, that it does
vary according to where they are in their menstrual cycle. And yes,
they also looked at people who had received gonadectomy, they had
their ovaries removed, a number of different important controls. None
of this surprises me, none of this should surprise you, it's very
clear that hormones have a profound effect on enlarge number of
systems in our biology and that smell, and taste, and the ability to
sense the chemical states of others, either consciously or
subconsciously have a profound influence on whether or not we might
want to spend time with them, whether or not this is somebody that
we're pair bonded with, whether or not this is somebody that we just
met and don't trust yet, things of this sort. And given what's at
stake in terms of reproductive biology, not just offspring, but given
the possibility of transmission of diseases, et cetera, you know, the
risks of childbirth, et cetera. It makes so much sense that much of
our biology is wired toward detecting and sensing whether or not
things and people are things that we should approach or avoid, whether
or not reproduction with that person is the appropriate response or
suppression of the reproductive response is the appropriate response,
right? As in that's the case with the tears. So, I think these are
fascinating studies, it's an area that still needs a lot of work, but
there are some really wonderful papers on this. And the one that I
mentioned a few minutes ago, Sex Differences and Reproductive Hormone
Influences on Human Odor Perception is one of the better reviews that
are out there. There are also a number of other reviews for instance
that talk about pheromone effects and their impact on mood, and sexual
responses, and things of that sort, and we will also provide some
links to those. A lot of this is still speculative, but I want to say
I know I said it three times, what I really want to underscore because
it is vitally important, and people seem to get a little triggered by
the notion of pheromones. Just because we haven't identified the
actual chemical compound that's acting as a pheromone or putative
pheromone does not mean that chemical-chemical signaling between
individuals doesn't exist, clearly it does.
Actually, you and every other human from the time you're born until
the time you die are actively seeking out and sensing and evaluating
the chemicals that come from other individuals. There's a really nice
study that was done by the Weizmann Institute, a group there, I think
it was also Noam Sobel's group, but another group as well as I recall
looking at human-human interactions when they meet for the first time.
It's a remarkable study because what they found was people would reach
out and shake hands. It's is a typical response, you know pre-
pandemic, people would meet, they'd reach out and they would shake
hands. And what they observed was almost every time within just a few
seconds of having shaken hands with this new individual, people will
touch their eyes almost without fail. Occasionally, they would touch
their eyebrow, occasionally someone would touch their hair. We always
associate that with people having some sort of... Or us having some
sort of self-conscious response like oh, we want to make sure shirt
tucked in and all prim and proper, whatever it is, or looking right,
is there something you're like teeth? This kind of thing, but actually
people are doing that even if the person they just met left the room.
So, someone's sitting there, someone comes in, they shake hands, and
the person inevitably subconsciously touches their eyes. They are
taking chemicals from the skin contact and they are placing it on a
mucosal membrane of some sort, typically not up to their nose or in
their mouth, typically on their eyes. Now, animals do this all the
time, there's a phenomenon in animals called bunting. If you have a
overeager dog that when you meet them or you see them again after
you've been away for the day they'll rub their head against you,
right? Cats will do this too, it's called bunting, they're rubbing
their scent glands on you, they're marking you. And believe it or not,
you're marking other people when you shake their hand, and they are
then taking your mark and rubbing it on themselves subconsciously. So,
we all do these kinds of behaviors, and now that you're aware of it
you can watch for it in your environment, you can pay attention to
people. Some of this has probably changed in light of the events of
2020, et cetera, but nonetheless, we are evaluating the molecules on
people's breath, we are evaluating the molecules on people's skin by
actively rubbing it on ourselves. And we are actively involved in
sensing not just their facial expressions, the size of their pupils,
and things like that, but the chemicals that they are emitting, their
hormone status, how they smell. We're detecting the pheromones
possibly, but certainly the odors in their breath. You might say,
"Well, I don't actually go around sniffing people's breath. I don't,
you know, unless if it's bad," in which case it's aversive, but breath
is communicating a lot of signals. And this handshake eye rub
experiment shows that we are actively going through behaviors
reflexively to wipe ourselves or smear ourselves with other people's
chemicals. Now, that might seem odd or even gross to you, but I think
it's beautiful, I think that it illustrates the extent to which we as
human beings are in some ways among the other animals in our
subconscious, sometimes conscious, but certainly subconscious tendency
to try and evaluate our chemical environment through what we inhale
through our nose, what we ingest through our mouth, and what we
actively take off other people's skin and rub on ourselves to evaluate
it and what we should do about it, and perhaps that person as well. So
today, we talked a lot about olfaction taste and chemical sensing
between individuals.
I'd like to think that you now know a lot about how your smell system
works and why inhaling is a really good thing to do in general for
waking up your brain, and for cognitive function, and for enhancing
your sense of smell. We talked about how to enhance your sense of
taste, and we talked about chemical signaling between individuals as a
way of communicating some important aspects about biology. People are
shaping each other's biology all the time by way of these chemicals
that are being traded from one body to the next through air, and skin
to skin contact, and tears. If you're enjoying this podcast and you're
finding the information useful please subscribe on YouTube, that's one
of the best ways to support us. You can also put any questions you
have and feedback in the comment section on YouTube. If you don't
already subscribe on Apple and Spotify, you can support us by
subscribing on Apple and Spotify. And on apple, you get the
opportunity to leave us a review up to five stars, If you think we
deserve five stars please give us a five star review. In any case, you
can leave us comments there. And we are also very active on Instagram,
@hubermanlab on Instagram is where I post yes, clips from the podcast,
but also additional new and original content, and you have the
opportunity to put your questions in the comment section below those
posts as well. I do read all the comments on YouTube, on Apple, and
also on Instagram. We have a website hubermanlab.com where all the
podcasts are housed with links to YouTube, Apple, and Spotify as well
as downloadable links, everything's zero cost of course. And there,
you can also find any links to additional resources that we might
post. As well, please check out our sponsors that we mentioned at the
beginning of each podcast episode, those sponsors are the way that we
are able to bring zero cost to consumer information about all these
topics to you each week. And we also have a Patreon, it's
patreon.com/andrewhuberman, and there you can support us at any level
that you like. Today, we didn't really talk about supplements, but
previous episodes and in future episodes we'll talk about supplements
and things that you can take to modify your biology and nervous system
if you like. We've partnered with Thorne, T-H-O-R-N-E, because Thorne
has the highest levels of stringency with respect to the amounts of
given compounds that are in their supplements, and the quality and
purity of those compounds. If you go to Thorne, thorne.com/u/huberman,
you can see all the supplements that I take and get 20% off any of
those supplements as well as any of the other supplements that Thorne
makes, you just go to thorne.com/u/huberman. And if you enter their
website through that portal you get 20% off any of their things at
checkout. Last but not least, I want to thank you for your time and
attention, and your willingness to embrace new concepts and terms, and
to learn about science and biology, and protocols that hopefully can
benefit you and the people that you know, and of course thank you for
your interest in science. [gentle music]
Thank you to our sponsors:
* ROKA - https://www.roka.com - code: huberman
* InsideTracker - https://www.insidetracker.com/huberman
* Athletic Greens - https://www.athleticgreens.com/huberman
Our Patreon page:
* https://www.patreon.com/andrewhuberman
Supplements from Thorne:
* http://www.thorne.com/u/huberman
Social:
* Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/hubermanlab
* Twitter - https://twitter.com/hubermanlab
* Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/hubermanlab
* Website: https://hubermanlab.com
Links:
* 1. What Is Color? By Arielle & Joann Eckstut
* https://www.amazon.com/What-Color-Questions-Answers-Science/dp/1419734512
* 2. The smell of tears lowers testosterone
* DOI: 10.1126/science.1198331
* 3. Inhaling (sniffing) improves non olfactory attention & cognition:
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31089297/
* 4. Smelling Salts & Improved Athletic Performance
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28922211/
* 5. Taste Receptors Are Expressed By Ovaries & Testes
* doi:10.1093/molehr/gat009
Please note that The Huberman Lab Podcast is distinct from Dr.
Huberman's teaching and research roles at Stanford University School
of Medicine. The information provided in this show is not medical
advice, nor should it be taken or applied as a replacement for medical
advice. The Huberman Lab Podcast, its employees, guests and affiliates
assume no liability for the application of the information discussed.
Photo Credit: Mike Blabac - https://www.blabacphoto.com